tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6851300.post1251896762139291494..comments2023-11-05T06:06:12.057-06:00Comments on The 271 Patent Blog: More on Patent Revenue and DistributionTwo-Seventy-One Patent Bloghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02481083706071978817noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6851300.post-22514326353817490942009-02-17T09:55:00.000-06:002009-02-17T09:55:00.000-06:00The link to the Acacia presentation was broken for...The link to the Acacia presentation was broken for me.<BR/><BR/>I believe the IBM numbers are greatly inflated, as they seem to include technology transfer revenue in their numbers, not just pure patent licensing revenue from otherwise infringing parties. They have great patents, but they have great revenue also, and that exposure tends to decrease your pure licensing revenue...but if you have something more to offer (as IBM does), you can drive your "licensing" revenue numbers back up.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6851300.post-25202870182805693612008-04-21T02:22:00.000-05:002008-04-21T02:22:00.000-05:00I struggle to believe it’s 1%, but even at 4-5% in...I struggle to believe it’s 1%, but even at 4-5% inventors are still being screwed in my opinion<BR/><BR/>www.loveinventions.comUnknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07785079137756827178noreply@blogger.com