tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6851300.post114019703963421494..comments2023-11-05T06:06:12.057-06:00Comments on The 271 Patent Blog: Two-Seventy-One Patent Bloghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02481083706071978817noreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6851300.post-28376255859429216222008-02-01T00:00:00.000-06:002008-02-01T00:00:00.000-06:00Examiners think god licks their assholes. They ar...Examiners think god licks their assholes. They are evil people just like george bush himself, stupid and make the obvious seem microscopic. fuck u all examassers. They could relate prior art to anything if they want. example, object 4 said is to that of object 3 said to be or is to of the same of 3. they could say the number 3 is just like the number 4 if they wanted. Try telling a math teacher that 3 and 4 have prior art togetherAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6851300.post-1142505811961207542006-03-16T04:43:00.000-06:002006-03-16T04:43:00.000-06:00Why can't most of the applicants' representatives ...Why can't most of the applicants' representatives properly set their applications ? Most of them are clever people who passed hard exams to become patent attorneys: i.e. they know exactly what should be done... and they don't do it. After that, the blame is on the patent examiners, of course. Weird, isn't it ?<BR/>Signed: a patent examiner, you bet ?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6851300.post-1142002502386675962006-03-10T08:55:00.000-06:002006-03-10T08:55:00.000-06:00hello from your friends up north.hello from your friends up north.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6851300.post-1141313185562331272006-03-02T09:26:00.000-06:002006-03-02T09:26:00.000-06:00...and Anonymous of 8:51 is probably an EPO examin......and Anonymous of 8:51 is probably an EPO examiner too. He's absolutely right nonetheless.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6851300.post-1141312963793516412006-03-02T09:22:00.000-06:002006-03-02T09:22:00.000-06:00Has anyone yet assigned a name to agents who simpl...Has anyone yet assigned a name to agents who simply miss whole passages of text out from between the bridge of the bottom of one page and the top of the next during amendment stage ? Whilst recieving not insubstantial renumeration for such a display of legal "expertise" ?<BR/><BR/>They are a well represented enough group to attract their own name in my opinion.<BR/><BR/>At least a couple of such cases a month at cross my desk.<BR/><BR/>Not that I would categorise myself under any of the names suggested in this blog, but stones and glasshouses etc... !Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6851300.post-1141311116811910772006-03-02T08:51:00.000-06:002006-03-02T08:51:00.000-06:00Anonymous above is clearly an examiner at the EPO....Anonymous above is clearly an examiner at the EPO. He's absolutely right nonetheless.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6851300.post-1141286376831549622006-03-02T01:59:00.000-06:002006-03-02T01:59:00.000-06:00I wonder whether such a "classification" of examin...I wonder whether such a "classification" of examiner types does exist also for the European Patent Office that is known to examine much more thoroughly than the USPTO. Here in Europe the common prejudice is: In US you can get almost everythig granted as filed ...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6851300.post-1140965894342771472006-02-26T08:58:00.000-06:002006-02-26T08:58:00.000-06:00We had an examiner that we went 4 rounds with. On ...We had an examiner that we went 4 rounds with. On the 4th round he had sent back prior art as part of the rejection that he had sent over on the 1st round.. (and we explained in detail why it was different). <BR/><BR/>Then the guy agreed to allow the patent if we changed a little bit of the description. He used this to do new searches with! 4 years later the patent was issued. Never mind the legal bills.<BR/><BR/>I classify him as the "jackass"Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6851300.post-1140743033497879882006-02-23T19:03:00.000-06:002006-02-23T19:03:00.000-06:00I found this highly entertaining. :-)I found this highly entertaining. :-)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com