tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6851300.post4963180580721409596..comments2023-11-05T06:06:12.057-06:00Comments on The 271 Patent Blog: In Re Bilski: Did Computer and Software "Machines" Get a Pass?Two-Seventy-One Patent Bloghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02481083706071978817noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6851300.post-76897253680471541132010-09-09T22:45:39.272-05:002010-09-09T22:45:39.272-05:00Honestly I don't think they glitch that often ...Honestly I don't think they glitch that often though.tungsten ringshttp://www.tungstenrings.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6851300.post-18536324491486242742009-08-07T01:50:17.322-05:002009-08-07T01:50:17.322-05:00The majority opinion carefully avoided addressing ...The majority opinion carefully avoided addressing software explicitly and directly. I guess it is not unreasonable to conclude that Bilski was meant to address processes not tied to a specific machine.cheap computershttp://www.electrocomputerwarehouse.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6851300.post-74055919642652545242008-11-06T12:11:00.000-06:002008-11-06T12:11:00.000-06:00I showed this post to a colleague of mine at work ...I showed this post to a colleague of mine at work (he does mechanical stuff). He said that the "particular machine" is the swing and chain.<BR/>Of course, if a swing and chain is a 'particular machine' I see no reason why a CPU and RAM is ALSO not a 'particular machine' but who am I, a humble computer scientist, to question the scientific wisdom of our judiciary??Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02440074941239184451noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6851300.post-58071236566603853802008-11-06T01:41:00.000-06:002008-11-06T01:41:00.000-06:00Great question Mr Zura. We are to set aside 102 an...Great question Mr Zura. We are to set aside 102 and 103, right. Seems to me no doubt that the method transforms both the swinger and the swing from stationary articles into moving articles. How to "get things moving" is a problem that has mystified humans for most of their history. Anybody who cracks that particular technical problem, in a new and non-obvious way, deserves the award by the government of a 20 year monopoly. Surely; no?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com