tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6851300.post7614486208712108352..comments2023-11-05T06:06:12.057-06:00Comments on The 271 Patent Blog: Consumer Groups File CAFC Amicus Brief in Support of USPTO Rule ChangesTwo-Seventy-One Patent Bloghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02481083706071978817noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6851300.post-5984801636147502752008-07-31T11:15:00.000-05:002008-07-31T11:15:00.000-05:00Ravicher does not know the difference between a CO...Ravicher does not know the difference between a CONTINUATION and a CONTINUING application. Most continuing applications are RCEs, which do not lead to the problems identified by Ravicher/PubPat/Consumer Watchdog etc. <BR/><BR/>Ravicher is still citing Lemley/Moore's "Ending Abuse..." long after the errors of that article have been exposed.Lawrence B. Eberthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05616776187293753324noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6851300.post-88966648695425756052008-07-31T08:57:00.000-05:002008-07-31T08:57:00.000-05:00“consumer advocacy and public interest groups”?? T...“consumer advocacy and public interest groups”?? That’s rich. These outfits are funded by and do the biding of some very large tech and financial services firms whose true aim is to kill the patent system, not fix it. That’s why they approve of these changes knowing full well the problems they will cause for small entities.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com