Tuesday, April 20, 2010

Patent Survey Suggests Most 2009 Trends Should Slightly Improve in 2010

Inovia recently surveyed over 150 US companies to assess the impact of the economic downturn on their global IP strategy and their outlook for 2010.  The company issued a follow-up report that summarizes the results and trends identified in the received responses. The respondents for the survey are alleged to represent a broad range of industries and sizes with most being small to medium-sized enterprises.

Overall, the report confirms that most in-house patent departments were hit significantly during 2009.  Over 60% of respondents indicated that their IP budgets were cut in the last 12-18 months: 38% indicated that the budgets were hit by cuts exceeding 30%; 29% indicated that budgets were cut between 16-30%, and 33% indicated that budgets were cut between 5-15%.

Also, when asked "will you allow more granted patents to lapse in 2010 than you have in recent years?", the respondents answered

Yes - 23%
No - 52%
Not Sure - 25%

When asked if the lapses were directly related to budget cuts, 69% answered "yes".

72% of the respondents indicated that they brought more work in house in the last 12-18 months; surprisingly, U.S. prosecution, foreign filing and foreign prosecution were some of the least mentioned work taken in-house.  For 2010, 51% responded that no further work would be pulled in-house.

The cost-saving measure most cited for 2009 was to reduce the number of foreign countries entered. Specifically, between 2008 and 2010 there was an overall decrease in the average number of countries entered - from 6.6 countries in 2008 to 6.3 countries planned for 2010.

To obtain a copy of the survey, click here (link)

1 Comentário:

Gena777 said...

While it's good news that the number of IP filings is up, let's hope that the recent economic upswing doesn't also mean a return to the practice of overpatenting, which previously resulted in a glut of junk patents and subsequent inefficiency in the USPTO, among other undesirable consequences. But perhaps, as long as the practice of patent law remains profitable, there is no way to avoid such circumstances.

DISCLAIMER

This Blog/Web Site ("Blog") is for educational purposes only and is not legal advice. Use of the Blog does not create any attorney-client relationship between you and Peter Zura or his firm. Persons requiring legal advice should contact a licensed attorney in your state. Any comment posted on the Blog can be read by any Blog visitor; do not post confidential or sensitive information. Any links from another site to the Blog are beyond the control of Peter Zura and does not convey his, or his past or present employer(s) approval, support, endorsement or any relationship to any site or organization.

The 271 Patent Blog © 2008. Template by Dicas Blogger.

TOPO