Monday, March 16, 2009

USPTO Warns Applicants Not to File PCT's With Search Authorities of Limited Competence

When international applications are filed, they are forwarded by the Receiving Office (RO) to the International Search Authority (ISA) selected by applicant.

On occasion, specific ISA's have limited their competencies for specific applications. For instance, the EPO will not act as an ISA for applications with one or more claims directed to a business method. Likewise, the Australian Patent Office has declared that it is not competent for applications with one or more claims drawn to subject matter set forth in "Annex A" (link) of the arrangement between IP Australia and the USPTO.

Nonetheless, quite a few applicants have been filing in these jurisdictions on subject matter that runs afoul of the competencies set forth above. Accordingly, the USPTO issued a notice, telling such applicants to cut it out:

The USPTO has noticed a significant number of international applications filed in the United States Receiving Office (RO/US) under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) where the applicant has chosen an International Searching Authority (ISA) which is not competent for the subject matter of the claimed invention. This can result in significant delays in the issuance of the International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority . . . To avoid significant processing delays, applicants filing international applications naming either the EPO or IP Australia as the ISA should take care to ensure that the application does not contain any claims for which the selected ISA is not competent.
Read the notice here (link)

1 Comentário:

Nick Robinson said...

Hi peter,

I found your blog post very interesting.i am Nick Robinson,a community member at Patents DOT Com(a comprehensive free patent
search engine).Will like to talk (through email) to you,is this the right time to talk about or should we talk during weekends?

Regards,
Nick Robinson

E-nickrbson@gmail.com

DISCLAIMER

This Blog/Web Site ("Blog") is for educational purposes only and is not legal advice. Use of the Blog does not create any attorney-client relationship between you and Peter Zura or his firm. Persons requiring legal advice should contact a licensed attorney in your state. Any comment posted on the Blog can be read by any Blog visitor; do not post confidential or sensitive information. Any links from another site to the Blog are beyond the control of Peter Zura and does not convey his, or his past or present employer(s) approval, support, endorsement or any relationship to any site or organization.

The 271 Patent Blog © 2008. Template by Dicas Blogger.

TOPO