Thursday, April 21, 2005

NANOTECHNOLOGY BECOMING ALL TANGLED UP: A gold-rush mentality has taken hold in nanotechnology, and patents are the precious resource being hoarded. As of late March 2005, 3,818 U.S. nanotechnology patents had been issued with another 1,777 patent applications awaiting examination. But entrepreneurs' ability to turn their patents into cash may be limited by crowded claims that overlap with one another, according to a new report from Lux Research entitled"The Nanotech Intellectual Property Landscape."

The study determined that, because so many patents have been filed relating to nanomaterials, and so many of them seem to overlap, companies that want to use these building blocks in products will likely be forced to license patents from many different sources.

To analyze the landscape of nanotechnology IP, Lux Research and Foley & Lardner systematically reviewed 1,084 U.S. patents - representing 19,485 claims -- that relate to five nanomaterials: 1) dendrimers, 2) quantum dots, 3) carbon nanotubes, 4) fullerenes, and 5) nanowires. The patents were reviewed manually on a claim-by-claim basis; no software automation was used. The team broke down patents for each nanomaterial platform by application and rated them according to how much "white space" remains for new claims and how entangled existing patents look, using a rigorous, quantitative methodology.

A summary of the findings can be found here.

Seja o primeiro a comentar

DISCLAIMER

This Blog/Web Site ("Blog") does not provide specific legal advice, it is for educational purposes only. Use of the Blog does not create any attorney-client relationship between you and Peter Zura or his firm. The Blog does not constitute legal advice and is not a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed attorney in your state. Any comment posted on the Blog can be read by any Blog visitor; do not post confidential or sensitive information. Any links from another site to the Blog are beyond the control of Peter Zura and does not convey his, or his past or present employer(s) approval, support or any relationship to any site or organization.

The 271 Patent Blog © 2008. Template by Dicas Blogger.

TOPO