Monday, April 04, 2005

YAHOO TO FINDWHAT: "LET'S GET IT ON" - (Clickz News) The patent-infringement suit filed by Yahoo!'s Overture against FindWhat.com is heading for trial later this month, after surviving the latter firm's efforts to have the case dismissed. A decision in the case could settle once and for all the issue of who owns the bid-for-placement technology that has fueled the paid search advertising boom.

A California judge two weeks ago denied FindWhat's motion to dismiss the case, saying there were questions that needed to be resolved at trial. FindWhat had contended Overture's patent was invalid and was filed too late.

The dispute centers around the bid-for-placement business model and technology used by both Yahoo!'s Overture division and FindWhat. In July 2001, Overture was granted U.S. Patent No. 6,269,361, "System and method for influencing a position on a search result list generated by a computer network search engine." Yahoo! claims the patent protects its bid-for-placement products and another patent it holds protects its account management tools.

FindWhat started the legal battle by filing suit to have Overture's patent invalidated. Overture later sued both FindWhat.com and Google to protect the patent.

Though legal questions have long swirled around the validity of the patent, the issue has never been tested in court. The suit against Google was settled in August 2004, right before Google's IPO, for 2.7 million Google shares, worth $270 million in August.

That settlement called for Overture to dismiss the suit against Google and grant the rival firm a fully paid perpetual license to the patent, as well as to several related patent applications held by Overture.

Pre-trial motions in the FindWhat.com/Overture case are set to be heard by the judge on April 11, and a jury trial is set to begin on April 19, unless a settlement is reached first.

Seja o primeiro a comentar

DISCLAIMER

This Blog/Web Site ("Blog") is for educational purposes only and is not legal advice. Use of the Blog does not create any attorney-client relationship between you and Peter Zura or his firm. Persons requiring legal advice should contact a licensed attorney in your state. Any comment posted on the Blog can be read by any Blog visitor; do not post confidential or sensitive information. Any links from another site to the Blog are beyond the control of Peter Zura and does not convey his, or his past or present employer(s) approval, support, endorsement or any relationship to any site or organization.

The 271 Patent Blog © 2008. Template by Dicas Blogger.

TOPO