USPTO RELEASES TOP 10 PATENT RECIPIENTS
View release here.
Tuesday, January 10, 2006
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
By Peter Zura
Linkbar
Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog
Subscribe to the 271 Blog Using FeedBlitz
BlogRoll
Blog Archive
-
▼
2006
(138)
-
▼
January
(30)
- MONDAY BLACKBERRY NEWSBITS:RIM wins against holdin...
- QUESTIONS TO ASK THE USPTO AT THE TOWN HALL MEETIN...
- WRITTEN DESCRIPTION IN PATENT RULES WHEN 'ORDINARY...
- LACK OF ANTECEDENT BASIS NOT FATAL TO PATENT CLAIM...
- CHINA LAUNCHES TD-SCDMA TELECOM STANDARD: In what...
- WILLFUL INFRINGEMENT FOUND DESPITE 3 OPINIONS OF C...
- *HOT OFF THE PRESS* - REEXAMINATION REQUESTS GRANT...
- BUSINESS METHODS IN THE COURTS: Back in 2001, busi...
- SUPREME COURT DENIES RIM REHEARING: The Supreme Co...
- BIOTECH JOINS OPPOSITION AGAINST PROPOSED CHANGES ...
- PEERING INTO THE MIND OF RAMBUS: Rambus announced ...
- USPTO KICKS OFF SERIES OF TOWN HALL MEETINGS IN CH...
- REPORT: JUDGE ALITO IS A "BLANK SLATE" IN TERMS OF...
- ANTI-SOFTWARE PATENT ACTIVISM INFECTS THE UK COURT...
- FROM BLACKBERRIES TO HYBRID VEHICLES - THE NEXT PA...
- EU RE-STARTS PUSH FOR PATENT REFORM: After last ye...
- TROUBLE AHEAD FOR THE "PATENT QUALITY INDEX?" As m...
- FRIDAY IP BLOG ROUNDUP: A number of new IP Blogs (...
- WHY THE USPTO/OPEN-SOURCE PARTNERSHIP WON'T WORK: ...
- GETTING THE OTHER SIDE TO PAY YOUR ATTORNEY FEES: ...
- USPTO TEAMS WITH OPEN-SOURCE TO IMPROVE QUALITY OF...
- USPTO RELEASES TOP 10 PATENT RECIPIENTSView releas...
- DIVERGENT EMBODIMENT IN SPECIFICATION MAY BROADEN ...
- JUDGE RADER: LIZARDTECH MAY "DOOM ANY HOPE" FOR CL...
- WHO ARE THE MOST LITIGIOUS COMPANIES? Peter Detki...
- IN 2005, PATENT LITIGATION . . . DECREASED? It's t...
- IF AT FIRST YOU DON'T SUCCEED . . . MICROSOFT TAKE...
- SHOCKER: 99% OF CHINESE COMPANIES HAVE NEVER FILED...
- USPTO MOVES TO CURB CONTINUATION PRACTICE AND FORC...
- SHOULD THE USPTO COMMISSIONER'S OFFICE BECOME MORE...
-
▼
January
(30)
Posts
About Me
- Two-Seventy-One Patent Blog
- Chicago, Illinois, United States
- Peter is a patent attorney practicing with a general-practice firm in the Chicago area. He handles a diverse intellectual property practice in the electrical, computer and software fields for leading technology companies located throughout the world, as well as for local and national start-ups and business ventures. He works closely with established and emerging-growth companies to implement successful patenting and litigation strategies. He is also a former patent examiner with the USPTO, and sincerely hopes you won't hold that against him.
DISCLAIMER
This Blog/Web Site ("Blog") is for educational purposes only and is not legal advice. Use of the Blog does not create any attorney-client relationship between you and Peter Zura or his firm. Persons requiring legal advice should contact a licensed attorney in your state. Any comment posted on the Blog can be read by any Blog visitor; do not post confidential or sensitive information. Any links from another site to the Blog are beyond the control of Peter Zura and does not convey his, or his past or present employer(s) approval, support, endorsement or any relationship to any site or organization.
Post a Comment